Wed May 30, 2012 9:27 pm
Fri Jun 01, 2012 4:16 am
Wed Jun 13, 2012 2:53 am
Wed Jun 13, 2012 10:35 am
kakashi wrote:I was playing around with the skin system
kakashi wrote:i noticed that i can't see the grid behind a transparent grid cell. about how long is it until that is implemented?
kakashi wrote:Also will partial transparency be supported?
Wed Jun 13, 2012 11:20 am
(cool) Hector wrote:Technically, partial transparency isn't a problem for me. I use it in several places, like when the mouse is over a cell.
Wed Jun 13, 2012 6:13 pm
Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:45 am
(cool) Hector wrote:You've finally solved your Windows problems ?
(cool) Hector wrote:cell transparency is already implemented in version 3.21.5. You must be doing something wrong.
(cool) Hector wrote:I find them messy. I much prefer a well defined background rather than a mix of two backgrounds.
Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:47 am
Thu Jun 14, 2012 10:48 am
kakashi wrote:By the way please don't think that's an actual skin.
It's just a mixture of random pngs from the project I'm currently working on.
Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:30 pm
(cool) Hector wrote:I hadn't thought about the case you've tried, and I don't know if it's important to worry about that kind of case. In my opinion, when you'll do a real skin, I doubt that you'll do this kind of thing.
Thu Jun 14, 2012 2:59 pm
This is already possible with the current skin system.kakashi wrote:- and semi-transparent purple tint over selected cell
I notice that it's just a tint, not a complex background that would mix with the other background.kakashi wrote:- partially transparent grid background
Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:01 pm
(cool) Hector wrote:The current skin system already offers an infinity of possibilities. Maybe I'll add even more possibilities. But for that, I'll wait to be presented with an actual skin that would really benefit from a new feature.
Thu Jun 14, 2012 3:21 pm
kakashi wrote:So make a skin like that then?
Thu Jun 14, 2012 5:39 pm
(cool) Hector wrote:You wouldn't seriously make a skin like that. It'd be awful. Personally, I wouldn't use it.